chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.
0 votes
See Post ->

Would've been nice to have...
asked by (21.8k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
I second that! We also need Swap.AllFutureInstances (or Swap.AllNextInstances()).
answered by (19.4k points)
0 votes
I agree too. We need Swap.AllInstances or Swap.AllFutureInstances
so that we dont write the same Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<T> again n again when u have mutiple instances to fake.
answered by (800 points)
0 votes
Luckily for us - its already part of future development of Isolator
answered by (11.9k points)